No spam, ever. We'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Already a subscriber? Log in
Anthropic's When AI builds itself "We looked at sessions where a human researcher took a wrong turn, showed Claude the session up to that point, and asked it what to do next. Mythos Preview improved on humans 64% of the time—up from 22% in 2024." www.anthropic.com/institute/re...
new study showing LLMs beat law professors at answering questions about contracts in a tutoring context, as judged by law professors. notably the LLM answers were much less likely to be rated "harmful". yikes at instructor 16's performance lol law.stanford.edu/wp-content/u...
Finally, objective measures to back up the "skill issue" reply
I had missed this earlier but holy crap, Anthropic will turn an operating profit this quarter. I’m genuinely blown away by this. And set to more than double revenues QoQ. www.wsj.com/tech/ai/mind...
Code: github.com/agude/dotfil... (Warning, 100% Claudeslop)
Amidst all the "AI is unremittingly awful and unreliable and will eat our faces" takes on BlueSky, I enjoyed this a lot. It mirrors my experience pretty closely. takes.jamesomalley.co.uk/p/how-ai-has...
Center = Alex Gude . Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.