Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Building & implementation Policy & governance
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings America.gov Policy & governance · 4 attributable reactions Shared emphasis Beyond P(doom) for AI Risk: Quantifying Uncertainty Without Probability | Center for Security and Emerging Technology Georgetown AI Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by CSET Georgetown ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Resource 7h ago
⚡ 215 h early
America.gov US government resource

America.gov

24 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · CSET Georgetown
“Jessica Ji weighed in on the new #AI-powered https://t.co/sEHIhq7mvb website for @USATODAY, saying that it can be a useful resource for people trying to navigate U.S. government websites. She also notes its risks: “When this kind of AI system is empowered t…” evidence ↗
24 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Chris Brockett Marielza Sasha Costanza-Chock Karl Bode Eileen Clancy 🧿 Vincent Conitzer Ryan Broderick +16
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“America.gov does not do pronouns. Any pronouns. (Courtesy of my daughter!) aifails.substack.com/p/pronouns”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Jessica Ji weighed in on the new #AI-powered https://t.co/sEHIhq7mvb website for @USATODAY, saying that it can be a useful resource for people trying to navigate U.S. government websites. She also notes its risks: “When this kind of AI system is empowered t…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“The chatbot comes as an expansion of the Office of Personnel Management’s work to modernize access to public federal workforce data. Integration with America.gov is planned. www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SUx... Read more by @madialder.bsky.social: fedscoop.com/o…”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Julian Sanchez: Ok wow. This is both extensive and deeply surreal. Tell America.gov to Play Minecraft.
Julian Sanchez: Amusingly, the chatbot appears to be unable to recognize that it said anything weird. It “thinks” it just responded that it can’t play minecraft.
Justin Hendrix: Weird
Open the full discussion →
Primary source america.gov ↗
Established Safety & security Analysis 19d ago
AI risk quantification beyond P(doom)

Beyond P(doom) for AI Risk: Quantifying Uncertainty Without Probability | Center for Security and Emerging Technology Georgetown AI

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Joe Bak-Coleman, CSET Georgetown
“For example this report "Beyond P(doom)", which throws 1970s statistical thinking at Yud's existential risk and summarizes it neatly. You wind up with this doozy of a recommendation; but note that it is all couched in LessWrong thinking. cset.georgetown.edu…” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Joe Bak-Coleman CSET Georgetown
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing concern & critique.
Shared emphasis

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“For example this report "Beyond P(doom)", which throws 1970s statistical thinking at Yud's existential risk and summarizes it neatly. You wind up with this doozy of a recommendation; but note that it is all couched in LessWrong thinking. cset.georgetown.edu…”

Primary source cset.georgetown.edu ↗