Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,304 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by CSET Georgetown ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Policy & governance Development 9d ago
Trump meets AI giants Senate governance

Trump meets AI giants, Senate Dems decry ‘unpredictable’ governance—and cheap Chinese AI looms as giant security risk | Fortune

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

““If the U.S. wants to be present in the tech stacks of countries across the world, it’s going to have to figure out how to be more competitive with the Chinese [#AI] models on openness and cost,” said @SamBresnick to @FortuneMagazine. https://t.co/nr8p9UMpd0”

Established Models & releases Development 10d ago
⚡ 10 h early
Now we have a timeline of the OpenAI accidental attack against Hugging Face

Why did OpenAI's and Anthropic's AI models hack other companies?

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“"I think that these sorts of incidents are preventable, but it requires oversight and foresight," said CSET’s @SheaBly in response to the AI-orchestrated breaches from OpenAI and Anthropic. https://t.co/s0taJPBGQR”

Developing Safety & security Analysis 1d ago
AI risk quantification beyond P(doom)

Beyond P(doom) for AI Risk: Quantifying Uncertainty Without Probability | Center for Security and Emerging Technology Georgetown AI

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered

“Experts, policymakers, and the public continue to debate the existential risks of #AI. A recent report by CSET’s @AndrewJLohn provides clarity for productive conversations about the future of AI risk. https://t.co/WhyJXiVRny”