Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,304 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by CSET Georgetown ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Safety & security Analysis 1d ago
AI risk quantification beyond P(doom)

Beyond P(doom) for AI Risk: Quantifying Uncertainty Without Probability | Center for Security and Emerging Technology Georgetown AI

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered
CSET Georgetown

“Experts, policymakers, and the public continue to debate the existential risks of #AI. A recent report by CSET’s @AndrewJLohn provides clarity for productive conversations about the future of AI risk. https://t.co/WhyJXiVRny”

Primary source cset.georgetown.edu ↗