Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Dan Hon ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Analysis 16d ago
Tao AI math misalignment essay

A Severe Misalignment of AI in Mathematics

11 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Robin Hanson
“If rewarding AI mathematicians by the same metric that we have rewarded humans ones make math go badly, then we are probably rewarding the human ones badly. With good reward metrics, we shouldn't care who wins them. https://t.co/CO6Z9o3mcW” evidence ↗
11 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“"...the push by AI companies to solve mathematical problems as a benchmark is detrimental to the science of mathematics, and to the mathematical community."”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“If rewarding AI mathematicians by the same metric that we have rewarded humans ones make math go badly, then we are probably rewarding the human ones badly. With good reward metrics, we shouldn't care who wins them. https://t.co/CO6Z9o3mcW”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Nathan Lambert: A great read. I have similar feelings about how AI labs approach progress directly and without nurturing of scientific communities & intuition. The math research community went through the transiti…
Melanie Mitchell: A great read. I have similar feelings about how AI labs approach progress directly and without nurturing of scientific communities & intuition. The math research community went through the transiti…
Jonathan Stray: There are concerns in here I share but I can’t endorse this. This satirical response kinda sums it up “A Severe Misalignment of AI and Cancer Biology” x.com/mbeisen/stat...
Open the full discussion →
Established Policy & governance Development 10d ago
Newsom California AI kill switch executive order

Governor Newsom issues executive order to accelerate independent oversight and advance the creation of an AI kill switch | Governor of California

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · James MacGlashan
“A "kill switch." Not accountability for the corporations. A "kill switch" for AI. This is what regulation looks like when you let SV billionaires and the "rationalists" control the narrative on AI risks. Enough already. www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/18/g...” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“A "kill switch." Not accountability for the corporations. A "kill switch" for AI. This is what regulation looks like when you let SV billionaires and the "rationalists" control the narrative on AI risks. Enough already. www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/18/g...”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Governor Newsom signs an executive order on AI safety ↘️ www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/18/g...”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

15 experts · 41 posts · 10d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Did you try this yourself? Because I feel like a lot of people who dismiss AI coding outright have no idea what it's like. People are criticizing and fighting the idea of it they have in their head…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 3 Research & technical analysis · 2 Policy & governance · 1
Grace: He's upfront with when he uses AI, so you can trust he's upfront with when he doesn't
mackuba.eu: Please just stop…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 20 posts · 10d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Yeah. To be clear I'm not saying AI did it because AI cannot do things. But the people who deployed AI recklessly did it.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Eileen Clancy 🧿: I don't see this as "AI did wrong." A huge library of targets in Iran was created decades ago. Targeting data on the school was 7 years old. Under Biden, a civilian harm mitigation unit would've ch…
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真): The humans abdicated judgment to the machine, and that was exactly by design. The system designers wanted them to do that.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 12d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“✋ "AI psychosis" 👉 "Autonomized AI sacrifice"” evidence ↗
Dan Hon: "First we will fall in love with it, then we will worship it, finally we will make sacrifices to it" Arguably we are already doing the latter
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: "First we will fall in love with it, then we will worship it, finally we will make sacrifices to it" Arguably we are already doing the latter
Open the thread →