Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Opportunity & adoption reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Data & Society ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI business Signal 19d ago
⚡ 52 h early

Ai medical scribes doctors

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Scott McGrath
“De-skilling and never-skilling is a hot topic in medical AI right now. AI scribe adoption has hit 80% in some clinics. They ease burnout, but offloading notes means outsourcing medical reasoning. Writing forces doctors to test their diagnoses. #MedSky” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Established Policy & governance Analysis 15d ago
⚡ 6 h early
AI job applicant discrimination responsibility essay

Assigning Responsibility When AI Discriminates Against Job Applicants | TechPolicy.Press

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Data & Society
““[I]f software cannot bear responsibility, the responsibility does not evaporate. It stays with the people and institutions that designed the screen, set its thresholds, supplied its data, configured it, bought it, and benefited from it.” www.techpolicy.pre…” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

““[I]f software cannot bear responsibility, the responsibility does not evaporate. It stays with the people and institutions that designed the screen, set its thresholds, supplied its data, configured it, bought it, and benefited from it.” www.techpolicy.pre…”