replicability distinction science paper
The Difference Between "Replicable" and "Not replicable" is not Itself Scientifically Replicable
3 experts are actively discussing the implications.
1 expert
1 community
1 sources clustered
“OK last one because this hits close to home Not only is it a great misconception that replication = truth (one doesn't imply the other) but also replicability is not a reliable metric to establish a crisis either (see our paper). arxiv.org/abs/2604.26268”
3 experts discussed this · 22 posts
Berna Devezer: "Each [metascience] unit should be staffed with researchers possessing expertise in the science of science, program evaluation, and data analysis, supplemented by rotating program officers who brin…
Berna Devezer: We should totally combine recommendations 2 and 3, and launch the golden age of science directly into the moon!
Berna Devezer: I guess it's just that gold is so boomer-coded
Open the full discussion →