Self-assessments with a sample size of 1 are insufficient for understanding what the thing is doing to your brain.
Pavel
Tracked through public AI activity and peer connections inside the directory.
- AI signals
- 16 past 30d
- Sources
- 12 distinct domains
- Discussions
- 100 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 2h ago
Articles & links
Not liking AI is now a terrorist act
- Wired reviewed over 1,000 pages of unpublished DHS, FBI, and fusion-center reports coalescing around a new label called 'anti-tech extremism.'
- A Delaware Valley fusion-center bulletin flagged AI data centers as extremist targets while conceding it had no specific plots or suspects.
- The term 'anti-technology violent extremism' does not appear in any publicly available DHS or FBI extremism documents, per Wired's review.
It's just science
We told everyone that programming wasn't the hard part, but no one believed us. The reason LLMs can excrete sort-of-okay code is that sort-of-okay code has been a commodity good for 20+ years. Then, just like now, the bottleneck was understanding what people actually want.
Makes me think of this (and the conscientious objector option)
Sure, on the one hand Muse doesn't really do anything, but on the other hand it opens up a massive attack surface on literally all your shit
Recent commentary
AI boosters have started diagnosing opponents with "anti-AI psychosis". How creative.
Due to a typo, OpenAI has invested 5 billion dollars into the construction of a cutting edge data centaur
using AI trained on stolen work to make a shoddy copy of that work on the cheap AKA the six-finger discount
"Oh, I only use LLMs for research. I just use AI for ideas. ChatGPT wrote the first draft, nothing else." So what you're telling me is that it's doing all your thinking for you.
AI startups be like: the Central Intelligence Agency employs 10,000 agents. What if those agents.......could be agentic?? we are looking a seed round of nine hundred million dollars
A great deal of AI thought leadership articles can be summed up as "We all agreed we were tired of reading AI slop, but it turns out we don't mind writing it, so we asked AI to explain how it's actually extremely brave of us to do this, rather than just plain lazy and hypocritical"
Woman loudly talking on the phone: "Well I put it into ChatGPT to optimize our weekend and that's what it came up with. So you're just going to have to figure it out." Hanging up, complaining to her companion: "I never get a call from my son, and suddenly he calls about this!"
Remarkable that "PhD level" super genius LLMs can't detect the sentiment my newsletter might have towards AI
Missed two weeks of newsletter in a row. The piece is nearly done but I can't bring myself to write about AI again. What else is going on in UX that isn't just "your TV is now pervert glasses?"
With AI on the blockchain, you could insert The Fonz into any TV show you watch
In Pavel's orbit
Center = Pavel. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
Are you Pavel? Show it.
Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.
Markdown: [](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/spavel-bsky-social)