The pope becoming an insightful AI pundit is really a fascinating thing to see. He's not buying the hype, but he's not being a hater either. Magnifica Humanitas is the kind of work that only intellectually serious religions can make. Reactionary Christianity makes human slop, …
Matthew Sheffield
Articles & links
This paper doesn't use the term "intentional stance," but it does really expose that imputation of consciousness is an act by the observer that's usually not based on dispassionate analysis of the observed's internal structures. It's just vibes, and those aren't sufficient. ar…
Are AI companies burning cash too quickly to last? Critics often say that, but they don't present full numerical analysis. This is one of the better critical ones I've seen in a while:
- Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google are simultaneously deploying rate limits, paywalls, and price hikes in 2026, ending subsidized AI access.
- Anthropic's June 15 print-mode repricing, OpenAI's guaranteed-capacity tier, and Google AI Ultra are concrete signals of the industry-wide monetization shift.
- Labs spent years using investor capital to subsidize access and build user habits; the payback phase has now arrived across the industry.
Shorter version of this piece: LLMs aren't treated as moral patients, therefore they are not. This is a bad argument. How society treats entities isn't a valid standard for their personhood. If it were, then slavery would be fine. LLMs aren't conscious because they can't have …
Despite how wrong AI mysterians are, they are engaging with these systems in a mechanistic way that is generative of research programs and policy. AI critics should engage w/transformer interpretability much more. Doing so is the only effective way to regulate them. Great pape…
An under-reported trend of AI use is that women may be using it more than men. Men were the biggest users of ChatGPT in the site's early days, but beginning in September of last year, ChatGPT users with female-gendered names comprised 51% or more every month. openai.com/signal…
Funny you should say that arxiv.org/pdf/2512.18792
Recent commentary
It really does seem as if 99% of the people who think large language models have consciousness are men. I can think of one woman who seems to agree. Am I wrong to think that's the demographic split?
1/2 In the latest "Theory of Change," I argued that Pope Leo XIV's repeated rejection of reactionary and anti-democratic politics was explicitly modeled after Leo XIII's "Rerum Novarum." Lo and behold, today, Leo's new AI encyclical was dated explicitly to the earlier Leo's document.
Most things people think are bad about AI are actually problems with unregulated capitalism, which naturally transitions into monopoly.
Romance scams have proliferated on many social media platforms, particularly X. One thing I've wondered, do these accounts featuring AI-generated women target female-presenting accounts in DMs? I have other accounts that are non-personal & they seem much less targeted. Example below:
In Matthew Sheffield's orbit
Center = Matthew Sheffield. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.