Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Berna Devezer ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 14d ago

rpgroup.caltech.edu

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Also Kat's bricks metaphor is about science and has been for decades. It's why it's important to listen to scientists who work on theory, models, as AI turbocharges preexisting issues. See the classic "Chaos in the brickyard" one-pager in Science from 1963:…”

“I was just reminded of this old gem, which seems to capture the kind of degenerative process you're referring to”

Established AI field signal Signal 7d ago

pnas.org

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“abstract: We show that fully autonomous AI analysts built on LLMs can, cheaply and at scale, produce the analytic dispersion observed in human many-analyst studies limitations: the analytical paths AI analysts explore need not coincide with those human anal…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article