Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Doll ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 11 posts · 6d ago
Colin Fran Litterio Doll B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them)
Matches Concern & critique
“Well, harming people is bad for reasons other than how it might transform you as a person. Arguably the main ways that it’s bad to harm others have nothing at all to do with that in fact.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Doll: The question isn't “Does AI possess moral status?” This is a red herring. It's “What kind of person do I become if I make a habit of treating beings I encounter with contempt?”
Doll: Virtue is cultivated through practice. You become just by practicing justice, courageous by practicing courage, and kind by practicing kindness.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 11 posts · 5d ago
Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) Doll
Matches Concern & critique
“"If you didn't take the effort to write it, I shouldn't have to read it." Well, congratulations, you've just disqualified secretaries, ghostwriters, editors, translators, speechwriters, collaborati…” evidence ↗
Doll: This take must hit really hard if youre fucking stupid. If effort equals worthiness to read then all of us are already damned because we moved on from pressing a stylus into clay.
Doll: We have been reducing the effort it takes to create words since the dawn of writing because it fucking sucks and we dont like spending that effort on that. If ten words can become 100 and you read …
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 3d ago
Doll apenwarr.ca
Matches Concern & critique
“Dude @apenwarr.ca tailscale is probably the only thing that kept work from getting owned by swarms of exploit robots” evidence ↗
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
Doll: Dude @apenwarr.ca tailscale is probably the only thing that kept work from getting owned by swarms of exploit robots
apenwarr.ca: Yeah, who knew that Anthropic wasn't kidding about the whole automated exploit discovery bot thing?!
Open the thread →