Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Eli Sennesh ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Release 5d ago
⚡ 100 h early
Poolside Laguna S 2.1 release

Introducing Laguna S 2.1

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“Poolside AI's Laguna S 2.1 (open-weight) A 118B total parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with 8B activated per token, a context window of up to 1M tokens, and thinking and no-thinking modes. poolside.ai/blog/introdu...”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 5 posts · 2d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Markets & investment · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Sam Barrett, PhD: Its lucky that paperclips can only be made by humans because they have to be made with intention which only humans can supply. Therefore the risk is not light cone paperclips but light cone turned …
Alex Gude : Computers can make things, they can only cmake things... Ok ok I'm going I'm going!
Open the thread →
3 experts · 8 posts · 1d ago
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 2 Building & implementation · 1
Ted Underwood: Does everyone agree that Claude is a Bayesian? In my experience, its first instinct is always: hierarchical Bayesian model with partial pooling. Sometimes it will admit there are simpler options, b…
Ted Underwood: I like the thing, but "doing stuff with PyMC that could just be done with a bootstrap" is becoming a recognizable failure mode
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 6d ago
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Eli Sennesh: >finally get what fable's saying today >you write out the whole generative model >sampling means integrating over this generative model >one of your random variables is literally just an intermedia…
SE Gyges: i wonder if that's where this paper came from because it's kind of brilliant but also absurdly wrong in one way
Open the thread →