Join free with your email
Free. No spam, ever — we'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Already a subscriber? Log in
What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.
One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.
2 directory members surfaced this signal.
“Happy UK paperback release day to our book! www.penguin.co.uk/books/468070... w/ @alexhanna.bsky.social”
2 directory members surfaced this signal.
“Returning to this thread after a busy week, now that I've had time to read your "stochastic flocks" piece. Link here, just in case anyone else is following: www.techpolicy.press/stochastic-f... >>”
“This article managed to annoy all sides, but there are good technical explanations of why this kind of system would be capable of finding vulnerabilities & writing functional code. Rigorous critiques of AI are systemic, it holds up even when it “does things…”
2 directory members surfaced this signal.
“The "AI is an ideology" section of my recent encyclopedia article, and all of the references cited therein doi.org/10.1093/9780... preprint available from: faculty.washington.edu/ebender/publ... >>”
14 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.
“Do read the whole thing, think about your personal and professional values, and how they can serve as strong grounds for resistance and refusal. leidendeclaration.ai”
“Weeks ago, @chanda.blacksky.app sent me this declaration, written and signed by a bunch of mathematicians. But I only had time to read it yesterday, which ended up being right on time given a new round of hype falling exactly under the patterns this documen…”
1 directory member surfaced this signal.
“@danmcquillan.bsky.social 's Resisting AI: bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/resisting-ai >>”
1 directory member surfaced this signal.
“My reply: Not everyone who disagrees with me, but people who are loudly aligning themselves with a fascist project. That opinion isn't knee-jerk either, but rather deeply informed. Some good starting points for learning more: @ghostdoc2026.bsky.social notai…”
13 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.
“This article ends with a good conclusion, but it is extremely misguided along the way. It is also a rich text for exploring how clear language helps make the point better. A thread: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... >>”
“This editor/author does the same “trick” as he writes: "Recently, the ability of large language models (LLMs) to predict protein structures and to accelerate the discovery of new materials has revolutionized both fields. New AI agents can now carry out many…”
8 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.
“How about a jet-lagged live posting while I read? Trying to read this because I keep getting tagged in posts about it, but the first paragraph already contains synthetic text (a quote from Claude). I will skip that bit and persevere... www.theguardian.com/t…”
“Starts with asking Claude if it’s a “moral patient” and goes downhill from there.”
3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
“Over on linkedin, I heard from Jeanna Matthews, co-chairing an ACM taskforce on Responsible AI use (saving commentary on that framing for later…) that this decision does *not* come from ACM leadership & that community input really matters. Make your voice h…”
“Take some time (very little) to weigh on this: "Now Is the Time to Give LLMs Access to the ACM Digital Library" docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F... (not that I want to influence anyone, but my own position is along the lines of "hell no.")”
9 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
“For ideas on how to do that, see: buttondown.com/maiht3k/arch... /fin”
“Instead of railing against the latest “I asked Claude” article in a mainstream publication, I’ll just post this.”
3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
“Depressing that ACM is probably correct about this: "AI-assisted literature reviews ... are already changing research workflows. Publishers absent from AI ecosystems risk becoming repositories of record rather than sources of influence." cacm.acm.org/opinio…”
2 directory members surfaced this signal.
“I did not submit anything to #EMNLP2026, which is probably part of why I missed this when it was first posted in May, but I want to say now that I am utterly appalled that @aclmeeting.bsky.social & @emnlpmeeting.bsky.social are engaging in this nonsense. 20…”
1 directory member surfaced this signal.
1 directory member surfaced this signal.
“Moving over to the FAQ, we find some pretty wild marketing. I guess truth in advertising doesn't matter if the target of the ads doesn't have any choice in whether to spend the money (tuition $$ from students' POV, UW budget from faculty/staff's) anyway. uw…”
1 directory member surfaced this signal.
“And all of the examples here, for that matter: buttondown.com/maiht3k/arch...”