Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings An opt-in vulnerability-finding service for open-source software Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by evacide ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Release 13d ago
⚡ 4 h early
Anthropic open source vulnerability service

An opt-in vulnerability-finding service for open-source software

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tim Kellogg
“Claude for critical infrastructure Anthropic has a new program where open source projects can apply to use a new service for code review to spot vulnerabilities Users must prove that they’re actually maintainers, and projects must be critical infrastructure…” evidence ↗
6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Tim Kellogg evacide Eileen Clancy 🧿 James Grimmelmann Luis Villa mackuba.eu
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“I understand that Anthropic thinks they're doing open source projects a favor here, but what they're actually doing is creating an enormous amount of work for people that they are not paying. www.anthropic.com/research/lau...”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Claude for critical infrastructure Anthropic has a new program where open source projects can apply to use a new service for code review to spot vulnerabilities Users must prove that they’re actually maintainers, and projects must be critical infrastructure…”

2 experts discussed this · 11 posts
evacide: I understand that Anthropic thinks they're doing open source projects a favor here, but what they're actually doing is creating an enormous amount of work for people that they are not paying. www.a…
evacide: What do you do if you are the core maintainer on a project and your options are "more vuln reports than you can ever hope to triage" or "someone finds a critical 0day in your project and either exp…
evacide: I assume that the reason requests are considered on a case-by-case basis is that they think they will be able to catch all of these.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
Established Models & releases Development 13d ago
OpenAI rogue agent Wikimedia activities

OpenAI “rogue” agent activities found on Wikimedia projects – Wikimedia Foundation

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · evacide
“Wikimedia Foundation: "AI companies are not doing enough to secure their systems and protect the public from the harm they cause. That burden is falling onto everyone else, including smaller organizations." wikimediafoundation.org/news/2026/10...” evidence ↗
5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl evacide Eileen Clancy 🧿 Jason Moore Amanda Tepski

“Wikimedia Foundation: "AI companies are not doing enough to secure their systems and protect the public from the harm they cause. That burden is falling onto everyone else, including smaller organizations." wikimediafoundation.org/news/2026/10...”

“Wikimedia believes that OpenAI agent swarms made changes to non-public-facing files and changed some internal system configurations wikimediafoundation.org/news/2026/10...”

Primary source wikimediafoundation.org ↗
Developing AI field signal Signal 2d ago
⚡ 3 h early

ChatGPT now lets you lock your chats | TechCrunch

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · evacide
“When a platform offers you privacy, always ask "Privacy from whom?" "Of course, while locking a chat can limit access, it doesn’t address concerns about how sensitive information is stored or handled." techcrunch.com/2026/10/20/c...” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
evacide Eileen Clancy 🧿

“When a platform offers you privacy, always ask "Privacy from whom?" "Of course, while locking a chat can limit access, it doesn’t address concerns about how sensitive information is stored or handled." techcrunch.com/2026/10/20/c...”

Primary source techcrunch.com ↗