Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by evacide ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Signal 1d ago
⚡ 3 h early

ChatGPT now lets you lock your chats | TechCrunch

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“When a platform offers you privacy, always ask "Privacy from whom?" "Of course, while locking a chat can limit access, it doesn’t address concerns about how sensitive information is stored or handled." techcrunch.com/2026/10/20/c...”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 6 posts · 1d ago
Shared emphasis Policy & governance · 2
Ethan Zuckerman: "In the US, legislation is written by lobbyists - maybe AI written legislation would be better" #attention2026. (Vass Bednar @canadianshieldinstitute.ca is skeptical...)
Ethan Zuckerman: Bruce Schneier @schneier.com wants to draw a distinction between AI's capitalism problems and tech problems, in hopes of making an argument for democracy-supporting AIs. He's aware that most of us …
Open the thread →