Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation Concern & critique
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Gambling prediction markets statistics Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Frank Pasquale ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Analysis 15h ago
James Gleick essay on talking to AI

Talk to It | James Gleick

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Frank Pasquale
““Weizenbaum understood ELIZA’s use of the first person to be a lie and warned his colleagues against it; Turkle agrees. “Whenever a program says ‘I,’ it’s a deception,” she writes. “That is the original sin of artificial intimacy.”” www.nybooks.com/articles…” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Luke Stark Frank Pasquale

““Weizenbaum understood ELIZA’s use of the first person to be a lie and warned his colleagues against it; Turkle agrees. “Whenever a program says ‘I,’ it’s a deception,” she writes. “That is the original sin of artificial intimacy.”” www.nybooks.com/articles…”

Primary source nybooks.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 4d ago

Gambling prediction markets statistics

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Frank Pasquale
“We are living through a “postpandemic gamified speculative-trading apocalypse of which traditional gambling is only one horseman. There’s also crypto, now an enormous industry still searching for a nonspeculative use” www.nytimes.com/2026/10/04/m...” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Hagen Blix Frank Pasquale Meredith Martin VE, cybersocial occult investigator
Primary source nytimes.com ↗