Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Gus ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI research Research 2d ago
LLMs read write neural network weights

Sparks of Weight-Space Programming: LLMs can natively read & write neural network weights

16 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 7 attributable expert contributions · Mark Riedl, Ethan Mollick, Ramon Astudillo
“This is fascinating. Very large models can read the weights of small models and intuit what those models were trained to do, and make direct weight changes to improve them. rikiyat.github.io/blog/weight-...” evidence ↗
16 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 7 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

7 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“This is fascinating. Very large models can read the weights of small models and intuit what those models were trained to do, and make direct weight changes to improve them. rikiyat.github.io/blog/weight-...”

4 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Ethan Mollick: If this holds up, it is big: "We asked GPT-6 Astra to edit Qwen3.5-0.8B weights to improve math. It directly changed only 0.016% of weights, fixing 0.8B's reasoning loops & improving math up to 6x …
Antonino Greco: If this holds up, it is big: "We asked GPT-6 Astra to edit Qwen3.5-0.8B weights to improve math. It directly changed only 0.016% of weights, fixing 0.8B's reasoning loops & improving math up to 6x …
Thomas Dietterich: Can someone provide a plausible mechanism for this? Has GPT-6 Astra been trained on neural network weight (or activation) interpretation?
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article