Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Markets & investment reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Markets & investment
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Hagen Blix ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 12 posts · 15d ago
Ted Underwood Hagen Blix
Matches Markets & investment
“I take that as good news on the capital-intensive part! But I’m more worried about the cost of producing new models than I am about cost to customers.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Ted Underwood: Both phases of this are worth reading: the crisis, and recovery. (A structure that reminds me of a famous similar crisis in JS Mill's Autobiography.) Personally, not v worried that human beings wil…
Ted Underwood: I admittedly do a lot of manual data labeling (RA work). But I also get to resolve disputes between different models and force them to cooperate, which is PI / assoc dean territory!
Open the thread →