Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Hagen Blix ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Research 10d ago
ML ethical judgments NLP paper

On the Machine Learning of Ethical Judgments from Natural Language

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Hagen Blix
“Don't forget about language! Also totally solved! (I co-wrote a paper a few years ago telling the Natural Language Processing community that ethics is not a benchmarkable problem that you can "solve", but.. well, you can imagine how much of an effect that had)” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Hagen Blix

“Don't forget about language! Also totally solved! (I co-wrote a paper a few years ago telling the Natural Language Processing community that ethics is not a benchmarkable problem that you can "solve", but.. well, you can imagine how much of an effect that had)”

3 experts discussed this · 8 posts
Hagen Blix: They're all guys who think the answer to the trolley problem is literally just a number
Hagen Blix: They're people who cultivate a "personality" around a particular number at which they'd flip the switch.
Hagen Blix: Don't forget about language! Also totally solved! (I co-wrote a paper a few years ago telling the Natural Language Processing community that ethics is not a benchmarkable problem that you can "solv…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source aclanthology.org ↗