⚡ 614 h early
AI theoretical tool cognitive science paper
Reclaiming AI as a Theoretical Tool for Cognitive Science - Computational Brain & Behavior
4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.
Why this matches
Opportunity & adoption reaction
1 attributable expert contribution
· Iris van Rooij
“"no finite set of ‘impressive’ observations about AIs/LLMs establishes that they exhibit a (human) cognitive capacity. (...) if we propose that a machine has a cognitive capacity X, we must also formally charactise X such that the machine’s capacity Y can b…” evidence ↗
4 experts
2 communities
1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting
Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings
Research & technical analysis
1 expertEvidence, methods and technical implications.
“One paper I thought a lot while writing was this by @irisvanrooij.bsky.social et al (linked in my piece; I recommend). There's a role for AI for "assessing whether something is computationally possible or not, in principle and in practice." link.springer.co…”
Opportunity & adoption
1 expertNew capabilities, benefits and practical upside.
“"no finite set of ‘impressive’ observations about AIs/LLMs establishes that they exhibit a (human) cognitive capacity. (...) if we propose that a machine has a cognitive capacity X, we must also formally charactise X such that the machine’s capacity Y can b…”
2 experts discussed this · 21 posts
Iris van Rooij: Footnote 23 in Reclaiming AI: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Iris van Rooij: "no finite set of ‘impressive’ observations about AIs/LLMs establishes that they exhibit a (human) cognitive capacity. (...) if we propose that a machine has a cognitive capacity X, we must also fo…
Olivia Guest: Footnote 23 in Reclaiming AI: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Open the full discussion →