Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Isaiah Bishop ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 14 posts · 9d ago
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Isaiah Bishop: Mathematicians have always kind of been in it for the love of the game, but thats a weird funding model for the govt. Like fund this weird dudes research into fundamental normalized co-sheafs of di…
Ben Recht: Hate to say it, but we pay them to teach calculus.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 5 posts · 1d ago
SE Gyges: i am actually pretty sympathetic to this; "we personally are clearly not able to figure out how to mitigate the impact of what we're doing" is obviously true the problem is they somehow reach the o…
Isaiah Bishop: it would be more believable if they took more of this stuff seriously at say OpenAI
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 5d ago
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Isaiah Bishop: FWIW i had to argue with the bird lawyer about what deterministic was, and it was maybe the worst conversation i had on here
Isaiah Bishop: i was told that LLMs are always optimized towards a fixed benchmark, i mentioned you could create a living benchmark that moved to people's tastes but could never be strictly satiated, was told tha…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 8 posts · 14d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Adverb: my take on agentic systems is that they're the hand-engineered way to do inference-time scaling and that the a lot of the core work there should and will be bitter-lessoned away eventually.
Isaiah Bishop: implies that the moat there is pretty weak i think? if the limit is resources surely anyone can do it
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 14d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Context & explanation · 1
rev. howard arson: the thing about using point samples of public opinion is that they are point samples, not the integral of change in opinion per message. in other words, they reflect what people already believe, no…
David Marx: (this is secretly a post about anthropic's "j-space" paper)
Open the thread →
2 experts · 7 posts · 15d ago
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Tim Kellogg: not sure how many people appreciate how much latency effects datacenter placement Northern Virginia was the original hotbed because it was the latency centroid of the East Coast but AI workloads ar…
Isaiah Bishop: do they even have to huge?
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 10d ago
austin: extremely funny workplace performance idea: team ai wealth fund. nobody’s individual usage is metered but the team’s is, and everyone gets rated on that.
austin: for legal purposes, this is a “joke”
Open the thread →