Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Jack Stilgoe ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established AI field signal Analysis 17d ago
⚡ 6 h early
philosophy industry funding open letter

Open Letter about Industry Funding and Disclosure in Philosophy

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“As philosophy rushes to claim expertise on AI, AI companies rush to control the philosophical narrative. Unlike other disciplines, philosophy has no standards for reporting conflicts of interest. This petition endeavors to change that: docs.google.com/forms…”

2 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Mel Andrews: As philosophy rushes to claim expertise on AI, AI companies rush to control the philosophical narrative. Unlike other disciplines, philosophy has no standards for reporting conflicts of interest. T…
Mel Andrews: It’s no accident that most philosophical work on AI sensationalizes the capabilities of these technologies in ways that manipulate public perceptions and global markets alike. Philosophy can do bet…
Mel Andrews: If you are a professional academic philosopher, please consider adding your signature.
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

9 experts · 46 posts · 17d ago
M.J. Crockett: Joseph Weizenbaum's 1976 book, Computer Power and Human Reason, has long been out of print - used copies sell for hundreds of dollars. It's wild that this is not more widely available given how muc…
M.J. Crockett: Weizenbaum was an MIT computer scientist who built one of the first chatbots, ELIZA. He wrote the book out of a growing sense of horror as he saw how “extremely short exposures to a relatively simp…
Open the thread →