Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Markets & investment Opportunity & adoption Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Statements — AHM Markets & investment · 5 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Jack Stilgoe ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Culture, work & education Analysis 13h ago
⚡ 123 h early
GenAI organised irresponsibility essay

View of Implications and Inferences: On the Organised Irresponsibility of Generative Artificial Intelligence

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Jack Stilgoe Ben Williamson

“A new paper from me, on organised irresponsibility in AI estsjournal.org/index.php/es...”

2 experts discussed this · 8 posts
Jack Stilgoe: A new paper from me, on organised irresponsibility in AI estsjournal.org/index.php/es...
Jack Stilgoe: Often, it is assumed that we social scientists are interested in the IMPLICATIONS of technology. I think instead we should look at the INFERENCES of technology - not what it implies for society, bu…
Jack Stilgoe: But here's Ben Affleck for the science bit
Open the full discussion →
Primary source estsjournal.org ↗
Established AI field signal Development 4d ago
AHM mathematicians issue AI statement

Statements — AHM

11 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

11 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Abeba Birhane Ethan Mollick Timnit Gebru joao Olivia Guest J. Nathan Matias Scott McGrath Eileen Clancy 🧿 +3
How the network is reacting 3 experts are independently emphasizing markets & investment.
Reaction converging

Markets & investment

3 experts

Capital, companies and commercial impact.

“"Releasing over 700 files at once is not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power. We urge mathematicians to discontinue their work with OpenAI and to return to a vision of science that centers human understanding." www.ahmath.org/statem…”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“"OpenAI has indicated total disregard for the norms of scientific research — norms that guarantee that mathematics remains trustworthy, ethically researched, and in the public interest... We reject OpenAI's assertion that this release advances our subject" …”

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“The human mathematicians are not happy with OpenAI. It’s a fascinating argument. Not about capabilities, but about the culture and norms of science. www.ahmath.org/statements”

2 experts discussed this · 8 posts
Abeba Birhane: "Releasing over 700 files at once is not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power. We urge mathematicians to discontinue their work with OpenAI and to return to a vision of scie…
joao: "Releasing over 700 files at once is not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power. We urge mathematicians to discontinue their work with OpenAI and to return to a vision of scie…
Olivia Guest: maybe some useful points on this terminological issue here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi85...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source ahmath.org ↗