Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis Concern & critique
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Critical AI Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions Reaction converging How LLMs Distort Our Written Language Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Jed Brown ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Analysis 20h ago
⚡ 793 h early
critical AI essay olivia science

Critical AI

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Anthony Moser
“@olivia.science of course has a great collection including a lot of her own research olivia.science/ai/” evidence ↗
5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Iris van Rooij Olivia Guest Anthony Moser Pavel Jed Brown
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“If you're in psychology or any of the cognitive sciences please consider that AI is more than a harmful piece of hype or pollutes the environment but also actively destroys our ability to do our science. A lot of my work related to this is here: olivia.scie…”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“@olivia.science of course has a great collection including a lot of her own research olivia.science/ai/”

2 experts discussed this · 9 posts
Olivia Guest: There's no engineering reason for human shaped robots other than that one actually. And there's so many engineering reasons against. The sooner people realise it has always been true & sexist (oliv…
Olivia Guest: Also see: bsky.app/profile/oliv... 2/
Thomas Dietterich: My colleague Jonathan Hurst (at Agility Robotics) has a long list of reasons why humanoid robots make sense. For years he was opposed to humanoids, but he found that for lifting and carrying loads,…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source olivia.science ↗
Established Models & releases Research 9d ago
⚡ 4 h early
LLMs distort written language paper

How LLMs Distort Our Written Language

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 3 attributable expert contributions · Eugene Vinitsky, Ben Williamson, Jed Brown
“Fantastic paper demonstrating how LLM editing is gradually distorting our writing and the way we think to write: arxiv.org/abs/2603.18161” evidence ↗
4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Eugene Vinitsky Ben Williamson Isaiah Bishop Jed Brown
How the network is reacting 3 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

3 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Fantastic paper demonstrating how LLM editing is gradually distorting our writing and the way we think to write: arxiv.org/abs/2603.18161”

3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Eugene Vinitsky: Fantastic paper demonstrating how LLM editing is gradually distorting our writing and the way we think to write: arxiv.org/abs/2603.18161
Eugene Vinitsky: Sitting in Marwa's fantastic PhD defense, trying my best not to just retweet all her papers
Isaiah Bishop: Fantastic paper demonstrating how LLM editing is gradually distorting our writing and the way we think to write: arxiv.org/abs/2603.18161
Open the full discussion →
Primary source arxiv.org ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 37 posts · 2h ago
Anthony Moser Amanda Tepski Jess Miers 🦝🦞 Jed Brown Amy Hoy Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Research & technical analysis
“I take a much different research approach when I'm outside my lane. AI serves as a good starting point sometimes, but I definitely have to go touch grass and talk to actual experts who can add some…” evidence ↗
Reaction converging Policy & governance · 4 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Amanda Tepski: In rebuttal to “legal? ai is getting there” I offer www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinatio...
Jed Brown: And beyond law, is a 67% error rate good for medicine? Is it normal medical practice to suppress data misconduct and 10 independent whistleblowers? It's only "getting there" when conditions to bypa…
Open the thread →