Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Joshua Grochow ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 5 posts · 4d ago
Eugene Vinitsky Joshua Grochow Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Matches Concern & critique
“If you're involving an LLM in paper writing / generation, your standard of care needs to be higher not lower! It's an under-tested technology which brings new risks” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: If you're involving an LLM in paper writing / generation, your standard of care needs to be higher not lower! It's an under-tested technology which brings new risks
Eugene Vinitsky: You can use the time you "saved" to check your paper more if you're going to do this
Open the thread →