Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Juan Diego Rodriguez ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 11d ago
⚡ 7 h early

Using AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things - Berkeley News

13 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Cat Hicks
“Ok, so if you've been following along my weekend I've seen this study/preprint shared around a bunch and I decided the people needed a replication opportunity it is here: persist-study.pages.dev Based on this: news.berkeley.edu/2026/10/09/u...” evidence ↗
13 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Hypervisible : 🤷🏿‍♂️
evacide: I cannot overstate how much I have built my entire personality around persisting at hard things, which may help to explain why I find rarely find AI tools to be useful.
Hypervisible : Same! I don’t think I’m overstating things to say part of the project with these tools is to sap our wills.
Open the full discussion →
Established AI research Research 5d ago
⚡ 3 h early
AI not ready strategic conflicts paper

Position: AI Is Not Ready for Strategic Conflicts

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Mark Riedl
“I wrote a paper on why AI ahoule not be used in military planning militaryai.ai/anthropic-cl... COLM Workshop paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.16189” evidence ↗
3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“I wrote a paper on why AI ahoule not be used in military planning militaryai.ai/anthropic-cl... COLM Workshop paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.16189”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Mark Riedl: If you find this concerning, come find me at the CoLM 2026 Workshop on Social Simulations with LLM where I will be presenting a poster titled "AI is Not Ready for Strategic Conflict" arxiv.org/abs/…
Mark Riedl: Source of quote: Time's interview with Trump time.com/article/2026...
Mark Riedl: Here's the abstract arxiv.org/abs/2609.16189
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 23 posts · 16d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Fortunately, that bridge itself is easy as heck to copy and make free. At this point pretty much everything that was gained from the initial pre-training is in fact, universally shared. Differences…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Ted Underwood: It's okay to learn from everything, and train on everything. That's everyone's birthright, and we shouldn't apologize for it. Prohibitions on copying were a late invention, and a narrowly tailored …
Ted Underwood: I like compromises. But one place I don't believe in meeting people halfway, or 5% of the way, is the notion that AI would be better if not based on texts/images that governments have made illegal …
Open the thread →