Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Erin Kissane ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Development 7d ago
⚡ 4 h early
Iran school bombing AI blame story

AI got the blame for the Iran school bombing. The truth is far more worrying

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“And then please consider reading in full Kevin Baker’s work on Maven and the kill chain from back in MARCH. www.theguardian.com/news/2026/ma...”

“It’s a good complement to this week’s reading on the kill chain.”

2 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Erin Kissane: Please consider setting aside a few minutes to actually read this, start to finish, rather than letting posts about headlines guide your sense of what happened.
Erin Kissane: And then please consider reading in full Kevin Baker’s work on Maven and the kill chain from back in MARCH. www.theguardian.com/news/2026/ma...
Dan Hon: Please consider setting aside a few minutes to actually read this, start to finish, rather than letting posts about headlines guide your sense of what happened.
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 14 posts · 14d ago
Shared emphasis Building & implementation · 2
Erin Kissane: I feel like devs who find LLMs transformative in a good way would have a better time and get further with people if they took seriously the possibility that software engineering (which always invol…
Erin Kissane: Should that have gone to drafts for future consideration? 1000%, but tomorrow is too wild for me to be online so whatever.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 8 posts · 10d ago
Shared emphasis Concern & critique · 2
tweety fish: have you checked out neoreaction a basilisk? I avoided it when it came out, even though it seemed good, because UGH to all of it, but perhaps I can/should avoid it no longer
Anthony Moser: to the extent that it comes up at all, "those people are in a weird ai sex cult" is sufficient imo and is primarily useful if someone is like "but all these Serious People are Very Concerned, shoul…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 15 posts · 14d ago
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
hipstersmoothie.com: Take architecture. we would all agree that there are beautiful buildings. those require detailed, skillful engineering, most don’t have the capacity to appreciate If we created a program that could…
hipstersmoothie.com: There were a whole lotta blacksmiths. Automation took away their craft too, are their works any less impressive? Is forging my own knives not a meaningful pursuit?
Open the thread →