Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Kyle ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 10 posts · 18d ago
Multiple readings Questions & unknowns · 2 Building & implementation · 1
Sung Kim: Look at what Meta did. They acquired Manus because Manus understood agents. Meta later had to unwind it, but the underlying point still stands: product instinct matters.
Sung Kim: OpenAI’s Dev Day 2026 was an unmitigated disaster. Now they’re trying to recover over the next 28 days. We’ll see. If it were up to me, I’d fire the cool, hip, highly educated people and hire more …
Open the thread →
3 experts · 7 posts · 13d ago
tweety fish: ok it was more than a couple of days but here it is: xo, for people with ADHD who would like to use AI agents to help them with that. the idea is that this gets you moving from a standing start: yo…
Kyle: *whomst
Open the thread →