Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources

Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Who is contributing? How are they reacting?

Topic Search developments Clear all

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Daniel Lowd ×

New & accelerating

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

Debates gaining attention

2 experts · 2 posts · 5d ago

David Mimno Daniel Lowd

Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2

David Mimno: Remember that LeCun was one of about 5 people in the world who thought neural networks were worth studying in the 2000s

Daniel Lowd: I strongly agree that things outside of LLMs are worth studying, but I strongly disagree that LLMs are not worth studying.

Open the thread →