Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Mary Branscombe ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 11 posts · 9d ago
e.w. niedermeyer Mary Branscombe Amy Hoy
Matches Building & implementation
“idk. the only real benefit of the book is there's more story (some of the stuff in the movie didn't make sense bc they had to cut out a lot) and there's more rocky (he's more developed in the book …” evidence ↗
e.w. niedermeyer: finally saw "Project Hail Mary" this weekend without knowing anything about it other than that it was written by the guy who wrote "The Martian," and wow I was not prepared for how hilariously goof…
Amy Hoy: this is a case of "movie > book except in a couple ways"
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 11d ago
Eugene Vinitsky Mary Branscombe
Matches Building & implementation
“I mean, how are we supposed to trust the ethical compass of AI researchers and developers who stay on the Nazi csam site? I call it X because it sure isn’t twitter any more” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
Mary Branscombe: I mean, how are we supposed to trust the ethical compass of AI researchers and developers who stay on the Nazi csam site? I call it X because it sure isn’t twitter any more
Eugene Vinitsky: I think I'm pretty much explicitly trying not to draw such a strong moral claim. I think for most people it, somewhat rationally, feels like a small harm
Open the thread →