Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Mike Masnick ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 12 h early

ChatGPT wrote her “resignation.” She says she never meant to quit.

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“I’m not sure if this is a case of failing to check the AI’s outputs, or a case of retroactively trying to blame the AI for a decision she now regrets. runtimewire.com/article/chat...”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 3 posts · 4d ago
Mike Masnick: Many, many people insist that AI tools need to be more proactive in pointing people to crisis hotlines. There are scenarios where it's appropriate. But there are also scenarios where it's not. Unfo…
Jess Miers 🦝🦞: Many, many people insist that AI tools need to be more proactive in pointing people to crisis hotlines. There are scenarios where it's appropriate. But there are also scenarios where it's not. Unfo…
Open the thread →