Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by M.J. Crockett ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Agents & robotics Signal 5d ago
⚡ 39 h early

Ai consciousness agents email

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“AI agents are emailing consciousness researchers to debate their subjectivity and point to the literature as evidence. Cognitive scientists argue clever prompting and drawing from training data are behind this trend, but the distinction between mimicry and …”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 4 posts · 4d ago
M.J. Crockett: "An alternative read of everything we’re presented is just that three credulous people whose lives revolve around AI consciousness took their spam emails too seriously."
Meredith Martin: "An alternative read of everything we’re presented is just that three credulous people whose lives revolve around AI consciousness took their spam emails too seriously."
Open the thread →