“it was the paper's authors” evidence ↗
The Who's Who of AI
What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.
Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.
See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.
Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.
No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.
The questions experts are actively pulling apart
One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.
No developments match these filters yet.
Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.
Clear filtersWhat experts are discussing without an anchoring article
“All scientific field distinctions are ultimately socially defined categories. So the Transformers paper was an “NLP paper” not because it was about language modeling and MT, but because Vaswani wen…” evidence ↗