Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Markets & investment Opportunity & adoption Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Statements — AHM Markets & investment · 5 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by J. Nathan Matias ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Development 3d ago
AHM mathematicians issue AI statement

Statements — AHM

11 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

11 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Abeba Birhane Ethan Mollick Timnit Gebru joao Olivia Guest J. Nathan Matias Scott McGrath Eileen Clancy 🧿 +3
How the network is reacting 3 experts are independently emphasizing markets & investment.
Reaction converging

Markets & investment

3 experts

Capital, companies and commercial impact.

“"Releasing over 700 files at once is not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power. We urge mathematicians to discontinue their work with OpenAI and to return to a vision of science that centers human understanding." www.ahmath.org/statem…”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“"OpenAI has indicated total disregard for the norms of scientific research — norms that guarantee that mathematics remains trustworthy, ethically researched, and in the public interest... We reject OpenAI's assertion that this release advances our subject" …”

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“The human mathematicians are not happy with OpenAI. It’s a fascinating argument. Not about capabilities, but about the culture and norms of science. www.ahmath.org/statements”

2 experts discussed this · 8 posts
Abeba Birhane: "Releasing over 700 files at once is not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power. We urge mathematicians to discontinue their work with OpenAI and to return to a vision of scie…
joao: "Releasing over 700 files at once is not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power. We urge mathematicians to discontinue their work with OpenAI and to return to a vision of scie…
Olivia Guest: maybe some useful points on this terminological issue here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi85...
Open the full discussion →
Primary source ahmath.org ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 7d ago

White Airbnb Hosts Earn More. Can AI Shrink the Racial Gap? | Working Knowledge

4 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
J. Nathan Matias

“It sounds like you're thinking about it similarly to this Harvard team that tried to use AI pricing to reduce the racial gap in Airbnb host earnings? www.library.hbs.edu/working-know...”

4 experts discussed this · 36 posts
Rachel Coldicutt: I have an evolving and slightly problematic observation about LLMs and chat bots which fits with none of my previous opinions, so why don't I try it out in a low stakes way on Bluesky where absolut…
Rachel Coldicutt: Anyway, one of my main problems with the frontier LLMs is that they are basically colonial, patriarchal knowledge engines and, wherever they are applied, they risk fitting the world to a set of Ang…
Rachel Coldicutt: BUT ALSO what if this is secretly a gift *in some very limited contexts* because - for the first time - literally anyone with an internet connection can get access to the language and attitudes and…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source library.hbs.edu ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 16d ago
⚡ 21 h early

mitpress.mit.edu

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
J. Nathan Matias Hypervisible Michael Ekstrand

““Algorithmic Realism” by @benzevgreen.bsky.social and @salome.bsky.social is on my short list of papers most foundational to my research. Super excited that Ben has turned it into a book, and it's available for pre-order! mitpress.mit.edu/978026205570...”

3 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Michael Ekstrand: “Algorithmic Realism” by @benzevgreen.bsky.social and @salome.bsky.social is on my short list of papers most foundational to my research. Super excited that Ben has turned it into a book, and it's …
Cat Hicks: Ordered!
Michael Ekstrand: when I saw them present the conference paper version at FAccT 2020, my immediate reaction was “wait, my research paradigm has a name now?”, and it's become a mainstay of my research talks and bibli…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source mitpress.mit.edu ↗
Established Culture, work & education Resource 8d ago
⚡ 33 h early
critical AI literacies summer school

Summer School: Critical AI Literacies for Resisting and Reclaiming

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Iris van Rooij Olivia Guest J. Nathan Matias

“Thank you so much for sharing @dim-ah.bsky.social It was such a pleasure and privilege to have you at our Critical AI Literacy Summer School, and so grateful you are spreading the knowledge 🙏❤️☀️ irisvanrooijcogsci.com/2026/02/18/s...”

2 experts discussed this · 13 posts
Iris van Rooij: ☀️ 📚 A joy to be at this week’s Summer School ‘Critical AI Literacies for Resisting and Reclaiming’. Grateful to our amazing and brilliant team 🙏 @marentierra.bsky.social, @olivia.science, @altibel…
Olivia Guest: Wish I could have been there but still in bed 🥲
Iris van Rooij: 💔💜
Open the full discussion →
Primary source irisvanrooijcogsci.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 14d ago

science.org

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
J. Nathan Matias

“That has been true for a long while in tech, but LLMs are much higher variance than previous systems, and they are being hooked up to many more critical systems with less oversight. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Charlie Warzel: I am trying to think of AI from a standard corporate accountability perspective and I found this line from the safety policy employee who quit to be the most succinct explanation of the concern. it…
Charlie Warzel: If you believe that soon you will not be able to adequately evaluate or vouch for what you product might do out in the world (saying nothing of the ways *other* people might use it) then one might …
Charlie Warzel: At the very least, what I appreciate about David Robinson's resignation press tour is that he's very clearly laying the ground work to throw the book at this company and its executives if some real…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source science.org ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 5 posts · 3d ago
J. Nathan Matias Cat Hicks
Cat Hicks: Nice! Bonus points for using it on a hobby project haha. I continue to use this skill all the time regardless of model improvements while I've lost a lot of other, more project-focused ones. Gives …
Cat Hicks: (if you saw it has open PRs I still need to deal with, no you didn't 🙈 I only just got my finger tendons working enough to type all day again, I'll get back to it)
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 7d ago
Abeba Birhane J. Nathan Matias Veni Kunche
Abeba Birhane: i appreciate people trying to place my work as an important piece in the current ai landscape but it is inaccurate to describe my work as ai safety. i do proper, rigorous scientific research
Veni Kunche: i appreciate people trying to place my work as an important piece in the current ai landscape but it is inaccurate to describe my work as ai safety. i do proper, rigorous scientific research
Open the thread →