Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Context & explanation Questions & unknowns Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings What will be left for us to work on? Questions & unknowns · 4 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Nicole Hennig ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Culture, work & education Analysis 5d ago
AI future of human work essay

What will be left for us to work on?

6 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Arvind Narayanan
“This is one of the central points in my ICML keynote, with a lot of detail — see part 2. https://t.co/Lwsr0sUZfR Note: I take RSI seriously! One of our big empirical projects is evaluating agents' ability to do open-ended AI research. But it doesn't imply m…” evidence ↗
6 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Melanie Mitchell Arvind Narayanan Ted Underwood Michiel van de Panne Nicole Hennig Stephen Turner
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Questions & unknowns

2 experts

What remains unresolved or contested.

“What will be left for us to work on? www.normaltech.ai/p/what-will-be… #AI #work #future #change”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“This is one of the central points in my ICML keynote, with a lot of detail — see part 2. https://t.co/Lwsr0sUZfR Note: I take RSI seriously! One of our big empirical projects is evaluating agents' ability to do open-ended AI research. But it doesn't imply m…”

Context & explanation

1 expert

Background, chronology and why it matters.

“Thanks for that summary. It aligns very well with this text, which @sgray.bsky.social posted earlier today. (It might be a little better or fuller than Arvind's own overview at the top!) I really like the argument.”

7 experts discussed this · 18 posts
Ted Underwood: Can anyone who was there report the answer?
Maria Antoniak: Can anyone who was there report the answer?
David Picard: Hopefully nothing so that we could all get some nice vacations
Open the full discussion →
Primary source normaltech.ai ↗
Established Culture, work & education Resource 11d ago
⚡ 39 h early
MIT AI education report published

Report – AI and Education

10 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Nicole Hennig
“AI and Education- MIT’s Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, and Research Training aiandeducation.mit.edu/report/ #AI #education (very comprehensive & foundational)” evidence ↗
10 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Maria Antoniak Ted Underwood Grace Lindsay Damien Williams Eileen Clancy 🧿 Nicole Hennig Elizabeth Bonawitz Derek Willis +2

“AI and Education- MIT’s Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, and Research Training aiandeducation.mit.edu/report/ #AI #education (very comprehensive & foundational)”

“MIT report is superb. It acknowledges disruption, concedes different disciplines will handle this differently, foregrounds people and social interaction — but also says something obvious I had just about given up hope institutions could say: aiandeducation.…”

3 experts discussed this · 21 posts
Ted Underwood: MIT report is superb. It acknowledges disruption, concedes different disciplines will handle this differently, foregrounds people and social interaction — but also says something obvious I had just…
Derek Willis: MIT report is superb. It acknowledges disruption, concedes different disciplines will handle this differently, foregrounds people and social interaction — but also says something obvious I had just…
Ted Underwood: The world changing is mainly a problem for students. It also changes our ability to evaluate students — but if that’s the primary/sole focus of our conversation, we’ve forgotten the mission.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source aiandeducation.mit.edu ↗