Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Policy & governance
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings October 2026 Open Letter from the Scientific Community on AI and Cybersecurity Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Nicolas Papernot ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Analysis 7d ago
scientists AI cybersecurity open letter October 2026

October 2026 Open Letter from the Scientific Community on AI and Cybersecurity

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Yoshua Bengio Gautam Kamath Vincent Conitzer Nicolas Papernot
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Over 400 researchers and I have signed this open letter calling for the AI and security communities to come together to improve alignment and containment approaches in order to protect our critical infrastructure and digital systems. ai-security-letter.org”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“(1/4) I missed the message about this letter (ai-security-letter.org) in my inbox -- I mostly agree with the sentiments but: I'm *not* a lawyer but it may well be that the companies are *already* liable for the damage their AI causes to other entities.”

Primary source ai-security-letter.org ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 16 posts · 9d ago
Blake Richards Konrad Kording Grace Lindsay Dan Goodman Nicolas Papernot
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Blake Richards: I signed! This is common sense, IMO, and would be obvious in most other industries with the potential to have major impacts on other parts of the economy.
Grace Lindsay: I signed! This is common sense, IMO, and would be obvious in most other industries with the potential to have major impacts on other parts of the economy.
Open the thread →