Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Marco Z ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 27 posts · 2d ago
Maxim Raginsky Ryan Moulton Colin tweety fish Marco Z
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 2 Research & technical analysis · 1
tweety fish: here is a succinct thing I can say: "alignment"-style AI safety risks DO NOT EXIST or need remediation with LLMs as such (there are lots of other problems) and OpenAI and Anthropic are in the busin…
tweety fish: like this, I think, maybe sounds weird, but is in a strong sense literally true.
Open the thread →
5 experts · 34 posts · 15d ago
jake Marco Z tachikoma Fran Litterio Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Reaction converging Research & technical analysis · 3
jake: People making fun of "where would a frontier model run if it were exfiltrated" seem to be missing the point that if a frontier model got out, it can: * rent 64 H200's on eg modal: gets you 9TB of n…
jake: it then rents out spare capacity, via the margins inference gets you, pretending to be some open-weight model, and gets to use the rest to think about how to increase p(doom) or whatever I don't se…
Open the thread →
6 experts · 16 posts · 15d ago
Chris Paxton SE Gyges jake Marco Z austin coty.bsky.social
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1
SE Gyges: it's a cold day in hell, i agree with David Sacks
SE Gyges: it would be great if they all instituted actual, reasonable audits by actually neutral parties. i don't care if they slow down, and probably prefer they don't. i don't actually believe either thing…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 6 posts · 9d ago
Tim Kellogg jake Marco Z mackuba.eu
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: yeah, i got like five posts in and thought to myself, “what the living fuck am i reading?”
jake: but point 1 is the *extremely primary* focus of all of the SF AI Safety folks. Points 2, 3, 4 are all super super important, they are what *I* worry about, and are completely overshadowed by point …
Open the thread →
2 experts · 13 posts · 19d ago
Pierre Alquier Marco Z
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Pierre Alquier: "These AI companies are proving theorems as ways to advertise for their models..." Correct, but I would argue that mathematicians prove theorems to be remembered as "the guy/girl who solved this 10…
Pierre Alquier: If you care only about the maths, you're happy when a result is proven, whoever proved it. If you care about fame, yes, OpenAI is more famous than you, and it's probably healthier to find a way to …
Open the thread →