Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Marco Z ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

6 experts · 11 posts · 19d ago
Maria Antoniak: hot take: don’t even use it for polishing your reviews. as an AC and SAC, the last thing i care about is your grammar, spelling, or formatting. i get the presentation issues with papers, where you …
Marzena Karpinska: funniest part is that the one i saw looked like bullet points copy-pasted from whichever-ai-tool. there was no space precisely where the bullet points changed but the person said they used ai proof…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 7 posts · 16h ago
Reaction converging Policy & governance · 3
Ted Underwood: On reflection I’m not sure I respect the candor either, because, does Amodei have any expectation this will persuade ppl in tech? Surely not. Perhaps the actual audience for this is policy makers i…
Shubhendu Trivedi: Over time I have come to the conclusion that a lot of this isn't as much about regulatory capture and becoming a designated economic tollbooth (although there's that too). It's more like they reall…
Open the thread →
4 experts · 7 posts · 18d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Shubhendu Trivedi: Tinker is a good and easy to use tool. But imagine if every academic release was done this way. 4 years ago we decided to help humanity. Today, as part of our helpful mission, we release new PAC Ba…
Shubhendu Trivedi: Academics already have that tendency, but much better sublimated, and a bit more sophisticated (and it's actually true). But framing it this way would bridge these two different worlds (which are m…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 5 posts · 8d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Marco Z: op is low effort bait, so deserves a low effort paste: bsky.app/profile/dild...
Marco Z: the guy you screenshotted 🥶
Open the thread →
2 experts · 7 posts · 15d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Ramon Astudillo: This makes me think about the two iron rules from the last 15y of Deep Learning: 1. The bigger model the better 2. The more end to end learned the better Most of the failures in trying to improve t…
Ramon Astudillo: 👆There are currently two (now mostly one) victories against this iron rule, having to do with how these rules fail to work at all "scales" 👇
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 18d ago
Marco Z: I was about to ask what's the runtime isolation for tool calling on remote hosts, but yours is a better answer ^^
Cameron: I would strongly recommend against enabling any form of tool execution on inference machines
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 12d ago
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Jonathan Stray: Fusion power is gonna go a lot like AI. Empty promises for decades, then suddenly here faster than anyone can adjust to.
Marco Z: I think fusion gets a fraction of the funding, and needs really hc engineering to work
Open the thread →
2 experts · 2 posts · 20d ago
Rami Krispin: AI developers - how do you manage parallel features development of text elements (skills/prompts/agents) and avoid git merge conflicts? #ai
Marco Z: the only way to avoid a git merge conflict is to 🥁 git gud
Open the thread →