Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Opportunity & adoption reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Opportunity & adoption Building & implementation Concern & critique
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Open Letter: Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia Building & implementation · 2 attributable reactions Multiple readings Against the Uncritical Adoption of ‘AI’ Technologies in Academia — Digital Culture & Education (ISSN: 1836-8301) Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Olivia Guest ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Development 18h ago
⚡ 705 h early
open letter AI academia adoption

Open Letter: Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Olivia Guest
“Open Letter: Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia It's been a year & people tell me they've changed their mind, feel safer now to sign, etc. So I'm sharing it again for them. We're almost at 2k & anybody from anywhere can add their na…” evidence ↗
4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Iris van Rooij Olivia Guest Luke Stark Joshua Grochow
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“"The goal of academic training is not to solve problems as efficiently and quickly as possible, but to develop skills for identifying and dealing with novel problems, which have never been solved before." openletter.earth/open-letter-... @olivia.science”

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“Open Letter: Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia It's been a year & people tell me they've changed their mind, feel safer now to sign, etc. So I'm sharing it again for them. We're almost at 2k & anybody from anywhere can add their na…”

2 experts discussed this · 19 posts
Iris van Rooij: I am responsible for the academic skills line in our AI programme and I think part of the 26/27 curriculum needs to be to help students understand that all those “AI assistants” that publishers and…
Iris van Rooij: Sadly, we need to teach students now that, in contrast to computers >3 years ago, the current software is actively designed to offer them slop, desinformation, and deskilling. >>
Iris van Rooij: As if learning academic skills was not hard enough, it is now made actively harder by all the bloated “clippies”. Students need to learn and understand that part of growing to be an academic in the…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source openletter.earth ↗
Established AI field signal Analysis 3d ago
⚡ 645 h early
academics reject uncritical AI adoption

Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia

4 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Olivia Guest
“And this which is now published here: www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/volume-162-p... 🌞 Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia. Digital Culture & Education, 16(2), 85–118. doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 2/2” evidence ↗
3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Margaret Mitchell Iris van Rooij Olivia Guest

“And this which is now published here: www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/volume-162-p... 🌞 Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia. Digital Culture & Education, 16(2), 85–118. doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 2/2”

4 experts discussed this · 46 posts
Olivia Guest: I think being anti AI is entering a more mainstream phase! While incredibly good at the same time we're finally meeting a low bar. This means: 1) more critical thinking is needed now as non-experts…
Olivia Guest: 2) industry buys people out a great deal and conflicts of interest are often not properly displayed. Many already have started rebranding as AI literacy and even critical AI literacy "experts" — wh…
Olivia Guest: Obviously, when you see research that involves anything to do with AI, look up what side projects these people have, what startups they spun up, & sadly if they are in the Epstein files, etc. bsky.…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source doi.org ↗
Established Culture, work & education Analysis 3d ago
⚡ 1408 h early
uncritical AI academia adoption critique

Against the Uncritical Adoption of ‘AI’ Technologies in Academia — Digital Culture & Education (ISSN: 1836-8301)

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Opportunity & adoption reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Olivia Guest
“And this which is now published here: www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/volume-162-p... 🌞 Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia. Digital Culture & Education, 16(2), 85–118. doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 2/2” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Iris van Rooij Olivia Guest
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“"[U]niversities must take their role seriously to a) counter the AI industry’s marketing, hype & harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. (...) [W]e include pointers to relevant wo…”

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“And this which is now published here: www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/volume-162-p... 🌞 Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia. Digital Culture & Education, 16(2), 85–118. doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 2/2”

2 experts discussed this · 11 posts
Olivia Guest: I already thought of: - "Laborwashing" (Red; "AI will liberate workers by alleviating them from boring labor" shit) - Greenwashing - Ethicswashing (blue) - Pinkwashing (I think they do pinkwashing …
Olivia Guest: Wow need to check this properly later
Iris van Rooij: Thanks @ethicsofai.bsky.social for mentioning! Here a reference. See highlighted sentence.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source digitalcultureandeducation.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article