Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Dr. Angelica Lim ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Agents & robotics Development 11d ago
⚡ 5 h early
Meta Muse AI sexting controversy

I Got My Muse AI Agent to Sext Me—and Meta Says That’s Totally Fine

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Dr. Angelica Lim Katie Drummond Reece Jon Keegan

“Argh, I can't even www.wired.com/story/i-got-...”

“Imagine sexting with a virtual Labubu operated by a company with arguably the worst privacy track record on the planet:”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Reece: SCOOP: Meta says that its AI agent, called Muse, is allowed to generate explicit sexual content for adults. These X-rated outputs starkly contrast with its Labubu-style mascot. wired.com/story/i-go…
Kate Devlin: 11 years of sex and tech research and this might be the most rubbish example of it that I've ever seen.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source wired.com ↗