Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation Concern & critique Policy & governance Research & technical analysis
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings America.gov Policy & governance · 4 attributable reactions Reaction converging How employment is changing at Anthropic Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Phillip Carter ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Resource 6d ago
⚡ 215 h early
America.gov US government resource

America.gov

25 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

25 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Lightspeed Chris Brockett Marielza Sasha Costanza-Chock Karl Bode lastpositivist.bsky.social Eileen Clancy 🧿 +17
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Policy & governance

2 experts

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“America.gov does not do pronouns. Any pronouns. (Courtesy of my daughter!) aifails.substack.com/p/pronouns”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Jessica Ji weighed in on the new #AI-powered https://t.co/sEHIhq7mvb website for @USATODAY, saying that it can be a useful resource for people trying to navigate U.S. government websites. She also notes its risks: “When this kind of AI system is empowered t…”

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“The chatbot comes as an expansion of the Office of Personnel Management’s work to modernize access to public federal workforce data. Integration with America.gov is planned. www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SUx... Read more by @madialder.bsky.social: fedscoop.com/o…”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Julian Sanchez: Ok wow. This is both extensive and deeply surreal. Tell America.gov to Play Minecraft.
Julian Sanchez: Amusingly, the chatbot appears to be unable to recognize that it said anything weird. It “thinks” it just responded that it can’t play minecraft.
Justin Hendrix: Weird
Open the full discussion →
Primary source america.gov ↗
Established Models & releases Development 4d ago
⚡ 5 h early
Anthropic employment changes post

How employment is changing at Anthropic

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Tim Kellogg Dare Obasanjo Phillip Carter
How the network is reacting 3 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

3 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“agree, and this is why AI isn’t ready yet for the mainstream it takes a nontrivial amount of ingenuity to get past bottlenecks and understand what agents are doing www.anthropic.com/research/emp...”

2 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Tim Kellogg: agree, and this is why AI isn’t ready yet for the mainstream it takes a nontrivial amount of ingenuity to get past bottlenecks and understand what agents are doing www.anthropic.com/research/emp...
apenwarr.ca: So odd. They literally have absolute control over how many claudes they want to run
Tim Kellogg: talking with a sales buddy of mine, i’m increasingly convinced that sales has benefited from AI far more than programming, and yet hiring is increasing faster in sales
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗