Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Phillip Carter ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 9 posts · 1d ago
Phillip Carter Doll
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Doll: Its just wild how much AI has changed and how much its changed dolls life. Two years ago it had nothing going for it money wise.
Doll: AI gave us the means to leverage our skills into something to get a job with. Hugely transformative.
Open the thread →
3 experts · 5 posts · 4d ago
SE Gyges Colin Phillip Carter
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Colin: do you suppose, like I do, that are kinds of mathematics that LLMs are better and worse suited to? I admit that the level of proofs being produced by LLMs has now far surpassed my ability to unders…
Phillip Carter: extremely niche but this one was easily a top tier bit, courtesy of AI
Open the thread →
2 experts · 7 posts · 2d ago
Phillip Carter apenwarr.ca
apenwarr.ca: The Innovator’s Dilemma is a book about how that assumption is correct right up until it suddenly and epically isn’t
apenwarr.ca: Basically it says that for any tech improvement curve you’ll eventually reach a point where people don’t really need more of X anymore, but Y from a different tech curve suddenly crosses “good enou…
Open the thread →