Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Policy & governance reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Ramon Astudillo ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 5h ago

An alien mind

11 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Policy & governance reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Boaz Barak, Alex Turner
“A must read. We need everything - goal and value alignment, compliance and persona, behavior and monitoring, and coordination and regulation to avoid concentration of power and ensure humans are in control. https://t.co/JmJgQcMPnW” evidence ↗
11 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 10 posts · 7d ago
Matches Policy & governance
“I think there's a jump between "didn't fire people" and "wanted it to happen." But I would be feeling better about it if they showed/faced some accountability” evidence ↗
Grace: I think at the root of deflationary takes about the HF incident are two things: - AI technology can't be powerful because it will mean OpenAI did something meaningful - Being scared feels bad
Grace: That's #1
Open the thread →