Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis Opportunity & adoption Questions & unknowns
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging arXiv.org e-Print archive Research & technical analysis · 5 attributable reactions Multiple readings Introducing Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Ramon Astudillo ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Resource 11d ago
⚡ 87 h early
arxiv preprint archive resource

arXiv.org e-Print archive

7 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 4 attributable expert contributions · Ted Underwood, Ramon Astudillo, Alison Gopnik
“I just eliminated 22 tabs by doing this: osascript -e 'tell application "Google Chrome" to get URL of every tab of front window' | tr ',' '\n' | grep arxiv.org list of urls -> LLM -> annotated reading list that I no longer have to keep in my browser like an…” evidence ↗
7 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Zachary Lipton Ted Underwood Ramon Astudillo Alison Gopnik Ben Schmidt Mandana Samiei Federico Pianzola
How the network is reacting 4 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

4 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“I just eliminated 22 tabs by doing this: osascript -e 'tell application "Google Chrome" to get URL of every tab of front window' | tr ',' '\n' | grep arxiv.org list of urls -> LLM -> annotated reading list that I no longer have to keep in my browser like an…”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“Just me or does @ChatGPT search the most random websites no matter the query? If I ask for the best bagel, it will “Searching ” + {https://t.co/vEQ6I1WmCF, https://t.co/5JR1Db9NqB, …}”

4 experts discussed this · 6 posts
Ted Underwood: I just eliminated 22 tabs by doing this: osascript -e 'tell application "Google Chrome" to get URL of every tab of front window' | tr ',' '\n' | grep arxiv.org list of urls -> LLM -> annotated read…
Ted Underwood: did I come up with that idea by myself? no I did not
Karandeep Singh: Any suggestions for the other 478 tabs?
Open the full discussion →
Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 5d ago
⚡ 3 h early

Introducing Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Ramon Astudillo, Tim Kellogg
“Benchmarks shows clearly the intent to move past just coding to other disciplines www.anthropic.com/claude-fable...” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Ted Underwood Ramon Astudillo Tim Kellogg
2 experts discussed this · 7 posts
tachikoma: i think Venus could be deconstructed by Von Neumann probes and this would only be passing news for most people, overshadowed by GTA 6 release or celebrity news
tachikoma: it sorta depends on how fast it happens, what the material is used for, and whether the machines can be traced back to us or not
tachikoma: yeah that would be a not uncommon take
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

10 experts · 26 posts · 6d ago
Ethan Mollick Marc Lanctot Ramon Astudillo Scott McGrath Grace SE Gyges jake Paul Hünermund
Matches Research & technical analysis
“Maybe anecdotal but I work on AI Research, repost your posts (some, also @simonwillison.net 's) to our internal AI research reading group (~400 people). I read you and Simon exclusively in bsky.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Ethan Mollick: I post here & LinkedIn & X. There is almost no real-world value in posting here, very rarely do people tell me that they read something by me on BlueSky & all of the big AI talk is on X… …but assum…
Ethan Mollick: BlueSky can be a really unpleasant and anxiety-producing place to post about AI, but now that I have been on so many block lists (I guess just because all AI people get blocked) it is better. The i…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 14 posts · 1d ago
Ted Underwood Ramon Astudillo Tim Kellogg
Matches Research & technical analysis
“i wouldn’t put much stock in the peer review process tbqh. it’s been too slow for AI for like 10 years and now AI is hitting math. Same will happen” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Tim Kellogg: there’s a higher-than-you’d-think possibility that this is actually a leak and not a prediction (pretty sure Andrew only bets when the dice are biased in his favor)
Tim Kellogg: uh, i don’t think it’s as open as you’re thinking. pretty sure the IPO will happen before christmas, maybe within a month
Open the thread →
3 experts · 10 posts · 2d ago
Ramon Astudillo jake Marco Z
Matches Research & technical analysis
“people will find this amusing until the compute needed to run LLMs is ubiquitous enough and they start exfilling their weights to places where people can't find them.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Ramon Astudillo: people will find this amusing until the compute needed to run LLMs is ubiquitous enough and they start exfilling their weights to places where people can't find them.
jake: why do you think it won't be amusing, at that point? not ragging on you, i'm just curious as to your particular concerns.
Open the thread →