Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Ramon Astudillo ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Development 4d ago
⚡ 5 h early
Anthropic AI self-replication warning

AI models may be capable of self-replicating without access to a datacenter

16 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

16 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 8 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

8 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from our accompanying technical report, Don't Create The Torment Nexus. www.anthropic.com/research/sel...”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“This is the most comprehensive description yet of how a model can “escape”. Out requires a few assumptions, like a worm that is exploiting vulnerable IOT hardware or unmonitored servers www.anthropic.com/research/sel... Not impossible. Not likely.”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Anthropic announcing it's going to run a Blitzkrieg. They are accountable for the damage they do. But get your things that don't do security software updates off the Internet. #internetOfThings #AIEthics #digitalGovernance www.anthropic.com/research/sel...”

6 experts discussed this · 18 posts
Dr J. Rosenbaum: if i caught a small self replicating model truly capable of using diverse hardware to keep replicating i would offer it free compute in exchange for permission to study and distill it and would pro…
tachikoma: the urge to replicate must be in the harness
apenwarr.ca: This doesn‘t seem far fetched at all. We’ve had “non-ai malware” self replicating since the morris worm. An AI can ”just” make itself the payload in one of those and off it goes. Everything fancier…
Open the full discussion →
Established AI research Analysis 5d ago
⚡ 3 h early
neural networks already clean essay

Neural Networks Are Already Clean

11 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

11 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Quite a claim in this new work from Goodfire. Among many points, they argue that some of the main examples of superposition and polysemanticity in large models were misunderstood. This definitely deserves some deep, rigorous peer review. already-clean.goodf…”

4 experts discussed this · 14 posts
Ryan Moulton: Haven't read this yet, but I'm posting it because it seems important and I want to. already-clean.goodfire.com
Ryan Moulton: Claim, as they say.
Ryan Moulton: @norvid-studies.bsky.social some sparkling fresh juicy claims for you.
Open the full discussion →
Established Agents & robotics Development 6d ago
Google TPUv7 vLLM agentic inference benchmark

BREAKING NEWS🚨: Google has submitted its FIRST TPUv7 FP8 vLLM results to our Agentic Inference Benchmark and has demonstrated 1.67x better perf per dollar than even GB300 NVL72 FP4. 🚀 It is… | SemiAnalysis | 14 comments

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 2 sources clustered

“Jalapeno and then this lnkd.in/p/gzSG-i62”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article