Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis Concern & critique
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis Generative AI and News Report 2026: From standalone tools to information infrastructure Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions Multiple readings The Pain Axis: LLMs Represent Self-Directed Harm and Act to Relieve It Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by René Walter ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Models & releases Resource 1d ago
⚡ 191 h early
Reuters generative AI news report 2026

Generative AI and News Report 2026: From standalone tools to information infrastructure

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Felix M. Simon, René Walter
“Just how fast has conversational/GenAI been adopted? Fast! This chart didn't make it into our research report last week (reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/generative-a...) but nicely illustrates the point.” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Felix M. Simon René Walter
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Just how fast has conversational/GenAI been adopted? Fast! This chart didn't make it into our research report last week (reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/generative-a...) but nicely illustrates the point.”

Primary source reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk ↗
Established Models & releases Signal 5d ago
⚡ 26 h early

The Pain Axis: LLMs Represent Self-Directed Harm and Act to Relieve It

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · René Walter
“The whole terminology is fucked up in this paper The Pain Axis: LLMs Represent Self-Directed Harm and Act to Relieve It arxiv.org/abs/2609.16247 A model generating text learned from humans using language to express pain does not experience pain precisely it…” evidence ↗
5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Chris Paxton Grace Artificial Intelligence Papers rev. howard arson René Walter
3 experts discussed this · 11 posts
Grace: I will register some frustration with Anthropic, who tend to write about “functional emotions” in a way that makes it seems like “functional” is in a tiny font and “emotions” is in a huge one, when…
Grace: I also don’t want to draw strong conclusions about the “realness” of these emotions or sensations, other than to caution that it’s an area where it’s easy to jump to conclusions about the implicati…
Grace: I don’t want to downplay it too much, because I’m honestly not sure if I would’ve predicted it beforehand, but in hindsight it looks pretty expected given the pretraining objective. You should expe…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source arxiv.org ↗