Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Research & technical analysis
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging IN THE WEIGHTS Research & technical analysis · 4 attributable reactions Shared emphasis (One) Good AI Is Here - Anil Dash Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Reuben Binns ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Resource 17d ago
⚡ 31 h early
In the Weights newsletter issue

IN THE WEIGHTS

12 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Dare Obasanjo
“LLMs never fail to simultaneously impress and disappoint. Two searches for my name at intheweights.com showing completely different results with one accurate and one containing hallucinations.” evidence ↗
12 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Lynn Cherny Kashmir Hill Sasha Costanza-Chock Reuben Binns Dare Obasanjo Ben Williamson Meredith Martin Aram Sinnreich +4
How the network is reacting 3 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

3 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“are you in the weights? Hilarious and fascinating including the mess ups intheweights.com”

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“LLMs never fail to simultaneously impress and disappoint. Two searches for my name at intheweights.com showing completely different results with one accurate and one containing hallucinations.”

4 experts discussed this · 6 posts
austin: fun? I am in there. intheweights.com
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: Well, my strategy of having an incredibly common wallet name is still rendering me invisible to information systems.
austin: weirdly enough my github handle actually had a better score than my wallet name
Open the full discussion →
Primary source intheweights.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 16d ago

(One) Good AI Is Here - Anil Dash

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Anil Dash, Reuben Binns
“It is not science fiction, one such creator-built system already exists. We just need one of these tools in every little area, rather than the giant corporate AIs trying to be all things to all people, while making tools that tell kids to self-harm. www.ani…” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Anil Dash Reuben Binns
2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Reuben Binns: "There’s no risk that CorridorKey is going to tell kids to self-harm in the way that ChatGPT does. Because CorridorKey has a specific job to do. And that’s the way AI should work — solving a specif…
Lizzie K.: isn’t this technically just true of all predictive models…? (which this kinda is. predicting the correct alpha of individual pixels)
Reuben Binns: Yes! But it's one thing among others mentioned in this post (ethically sourced training data, fully open, etc)
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anildash.com ↗