Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis arxiv.org Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Rebecca Williams ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 4d ago

arxiv.org

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Ethan Mollick, Rebecca Williams
“Status quo isn't an option. You can either add additional frictions (adding fees, make services worse, ban agents) or remove them (provide more services with AI help, redesign work to make access easier). Paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2608.16603” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Ethan Mollick Rebecca Williams
Primary source arxiv.org ↗