Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Ronen Tamari ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Research 4d ago
⚡ 3 h early
AI not ready strategic conflicts paper

Position: AI Is Not Ready for Strategic Conflicts

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Mark Riedl
“I wrote a paper on why AI ahoule not be used in military planning militaryai.ai/anthropic-cl... COLM Workshop paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.16189” evidence ↗
3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“I wrote a paper on why AI ahoule not be used in military planning militaryai.ai/anthropic-cl... COLM Workshop paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.16189”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Mark Riedl: If you find this concerning, come find me at the CoLM 2026 Workshop on Social Simulations with LLM where I will be presenting a poster titled "AI is Not Ready for Strategic Conflict" arxiv.org/abs/…
Mark Riedl: Source of quote: Time's interview with Trump time.com/article/2026...
Mark Riedl: Here's the abstract arxiv.org/abs/2609.16189
Open the full discussion →
Established Policy & governance Resource 18d ago
⚡ 153 h early
inference cooperative AI governance

Inference Cooperative — AI, governed together

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Nathan Schneider
“The little inference.coop experiment is now a month old, and so far: - A really warm, well-aligned first member meeting - Recovered from a couple hours' of late-night down time - Green, private, and public AI models added - Loomio & Matrix servers for membe…” evidence ↗
3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Building & implementation

1 expert

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“Maybe relevant @ntnsndr.in in context of inference.coop (congrats on the launch!)”

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“The little inference.coop experiment is now a month old, and so far: - A really warm, well-aligned first member meeting - Recovered from a couple hours' of late-night down time - Green, private, and public AI models added - Loomio & Matrix servers for membe…”

2 experts discussed this · 3 posts
Nathan Schneider: We are now about half way to the threshold at Inference.coop where I'll have to give up my benevolent dictatorship. Want to join the ethical-ish AI train and help unseat me from power?
B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them): We are now about half way to the threshold at Inference.coop where I'll have to give up my benevolent dictatorship. Want to join the ethical-ish AI train and help unseat me from power?
B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them): @roblach.bsky.social shall we?? #NoKings 😜
Open the full discussion →