Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis Neural Networks Are Already Clean Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Shahab Bakhtiari ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Analysis 5d ago
⚡ 3 h early
neural networks already clean essay

Neural Networks Are Already Clean

11 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Tim Kellogg, Shahab Bakhtiari
“Goodfire: interpretability may be solved soon A new discovery shows that LLMs are directly interpretable without first “untying” them already-clean.goodfire.com” evidence ↗
11 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Maria Antoniak Ted Underwood Will Oremus Ramon Astudillo Suresh Venkatasubramanian Tim Kellogg Shahab Bakhtiari Ryan Moulton +3
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Quite a claim in this new work from Goodfire. Among many points, they argue that some of the main examples of superposition and polysemanticity in large models were misunderstood. This definitely deserves some deep, rigorous peer review. already-clean.goodf…”

4 experts discussed this · 14 posts
Ryan Moulton: Haven't read this yet, but I'm posting it because it seems important and I want to. already-clean.goodfire.com
Ryan Moulton: Claim, as they say.
Ryan Moulton: @norvid-studies.bsky.social some sparkling fresh juicy claims for you.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source already-clean.goodfire.com ↗