Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Context & explanation Questions & unknowns Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings GitHub - openai/math Research & technical analysis · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Amir-massoud Farahmand ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Development 15d ago
⚡ 3 h early
OpenAI angers mathematicians again

GitHub - openai/math

11 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

11 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Ted Underwood Kyle Cranmer Tim Kellogg Gilles Louppe Dashiell Alejandra Caraballo Samuel Vaiter +3
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 3 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Link: github.com/openai/math P.S.1: This reminds me of the Chinese room argument, though only indirectly. P.S.2: I imagine a few people at OpenAI have looked at the results. Also maybe some other people have looked at some papers since ~1h ago. These are o(…”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“OpenAI is working on at least 722 (so far) math manuscripts, all on GitHub in various stages of verificantion github.com/openai/math Why? I guess because they can?”

Context & explanation

1 expert

Background, chronology and why it matters.

“Oh my god, OpenAI just made the single largest advancement in mathematics and number theory in modern history. They released a quasi reimann hypothesis. This is just one of 722 proofs and advancements they released all at once. github.com/openai/math”

3 experts discussed this · 27 posts
Dashiell: I don't think there's a world where mathematicians aren't pissed about this. 1. Dumping everything is what the advisory group said 2. Just yesterday people were mad that Ant paid two experts to dig…
Naomi Saphra: I think (2) is actually good. It is weird, and makes mathematicians into some kind of benchmark evaluation annotator which they don’t like, but it’s just a hard time to be a mathematician. Destroyi…
Naomi Saphra: One big consequence here is you can’t use the duration of an open problem as a sign of difficulty/importance. But at least right now, there’s no way to develop interesting open problems through RLV…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source github.com ↗
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 12 posts · 19d ago
Eugene Vinitsky angela zhou Eli Sennesh Amir-massoud Farahmand
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Markets & investment · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Eugene Vinitsky: Academia undervalues applied work (it's not "clever"!) while many applied projects do not have an obvious commercial value proposition. Huge gap here where a lot of useful things live.
Eugene Vinitsky: I feel this very painfully because it is very common to hear "what is intellectually novel here" when I describe some parts of my work. And sometimes the answer is: nothing! But someone still has t…
Open the thread →