Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Stefanie Hane ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Models & releases Development 1d ago
OpenAI GPT-6 Astra launch

GPT-6 Astra System Card - OpenAI Deployment Safety Hub

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Worrying deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-6-astra”

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Cameron: Worrying deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-6-astra
austin: “we’ve noticed that the model is better at lying. also weirdly enough it maxed out these benchmarks! probably unrelated”
Open the full discussion →
Established Safety & security Analysis 5d ago
⚡ 385 h early
cybernetic forests X Y reframing essay

It's Not Just X. It's Y.

5 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“One of them is RLVR, which I’ve written about here as clearly as I could, albeit in a different context: mail.cyberneticforests.com/its-not-just...”

“Not using AI? You must pay an AI company $$$ to certify you, and then accept their AI-generated recommendations for how to not sound like AI.”

5 experts discussed this · 23 posts
Eryk Salvaggio: This may be considered spicy but as someone who wrote a paper in 2022 that put this idea into the world (re: image models) the LLM is not merely reflecting what people say on the Internet anymore; …
Eryk Salvaggio: It parrots the structure of how we discuss ideas to arrive at conclusions. They have abstracted that form of conversation into something a model can work with. But "it was obviously in the training…
Eryk Salvaggio: But all that is pretty confusing if you're stuck on the idea that language is thinking. The paradigm shift is that these models made unthinking erudition possible, and we have to grapple with under…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article